Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Johnson

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 3, 1985No. 84-922PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Per curiam

The issue presented in this appeal is whether the trial court below has subject matter jurisdiction over this case. Since we find that the adjudication of this complaint is within the exclusive, original jurisdiction of the Court of Claims, we must reverse the court of appeals and dismiss the case for want of jurisdiction.

In 1975, the General Assembly enacted R.C. Chapter 2743, known as the Court of Claims Act. As is well-documented, the Act waived the immunity of the state from suit, and created a Court of Claims which was to have exclusive, original jurisdiction over all suits permitted by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Burger Brewing Co. v. Liquor Control CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1973
  2. American Life & Accident Ins. v. JonesOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  3. State Ex Rel. Williams v. GlanderOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Brownfield v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Scot Lad Foods, Inc. v. Secretary of StateOhio Supreme Court · 1981

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. Burr v. Board of County CommissionersOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Mary Kate LEAMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. OHIO DEPARTMENT OF MENTAL RETARDATION & DEVELOPMENT DISABILITIES, Et Al., Defendants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  3. Ohio Hospital Ass'n v. Ohio Department of Human ServicesOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Racing Guild of Ohio, Local 304 v. Ohio State Racing CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Cooperman v. University Surgical Associates, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API