Legal Opinion

State v. Gibbons

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided July 8, 1981No. 107PublishedCited by 38 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BRANCH, Chief Justice.

By his first assignment of error, defendant contends that the trial court erred by admitting into evidence an excessive number of gory pictures, the sole purpose of which was to inflame the jury. The State, on the other hand, contends that the photographs were properly admitted under the rule in State v. Atkinson, 275 N.C. 288, 167 S.E. 2d 241 (1969), death sentence vacated, 403 U.S. 948, 29 L.Ed. 2d 859, 91 S.Ct. 2283 (1971).

In Atkinson this Court stated:

The fact that a photograph depicts a horrible, gruesome, or revolting scene, indicating a vicious, calculated act of…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. State v. HarveySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  2. State v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  3. State v. JoynerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1978
  4. Mathis v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. State v. EvansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by38 opinions

  1. State v. LawrenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  2. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  3. State v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988
  4. State v. RandolphSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1984
  5. State v. LowerySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API