Legal Opinion

State v. Lawrence

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 13, 2012No. 100PA11PublishedCited by 535 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Justice.

The Court of Appeals found plain error as to the trial court’s jury instructions regarding the elements of conspiracy to commit robbery with a dangerous weapon and granted defendant a new trial on that charge. The only questions before this Court are (1) whether the Court of Appeals applied the proper standard of review for plain error and (2) whether the trial court’s jury instructions regarding conspiracy to commit robbery with a dangerous weapon rise to the level of plain error.

Almost thirty years ago, in State v. Odom, we adopted the federal plain error rule for criminal…

2Cases cited49 opinions

  1. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by535 opinions

  1. State v. Ortiz-ZapeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2013
  2. State v. GriceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2015
  3. State v. FriendCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018
  4. State v. MooreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2012
  5. State v. JuarezSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2016

530 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API