Legal Opinion

Mathis v. New Jersey

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided June 28, 1971No. 5006; No. 5015; No. 5022; No. 5027; No. 5058; No. 5063; No. 5064; No. 5065; No. 5066; No. 5074PublishedCited by 77 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sup. Ct. N. J. Reported below: 52 N. J. 238, 245 A. 2d 20;

Sup. Ct. Ala. Reported below: 283 Ala. 308, 216 So. 2d 286;

Sup. Ct. Ill. Reported below: 41 Ill. 2d 177, 242 N. E. 2d 208;

C. A. 10th Cir. Reported below: 402 F. 2d 249;

Ct. Crim. App. Tex. Reported below: 438 S. W. 2d 918;

Sup. Ct. La. Reported below: 253 La. 992, 221 So. 2d 484;

Ct. App. Ky. Reported below: 439 S. W. 2d 580;

Sup. Ct. Wash. Reported below: 75 Wash. 2d 421, 452 P. 2d 232; and

Sup. Ct. Ohio.- Reported below: 18 Ohio St; 2d 167, 248 N. E. 2d 605. Motions for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and cer-tiorari granted.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Boulden v. HolmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. The People v. SpeckIllinois Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Maxwell v. BishopSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  5. State v. HudsonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by77 opinions

  1. State v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  2. State v. MonkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. ThompsonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  4. Ronald Clark O'Bryan v. W.J. Estelle, Jr., Director, Texas Department of Corrections, RespondentCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  5. Tezeno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972

72 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API