Legal Opinion
In Re Indian Gaming Related Cases
District Court, N.D. California
Decided June 15, 2001No. C 97-04693, C 98-01806 CWPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
147 F.Supp.2d 1011 (2001)
In re INDIAN GAMING RELATED CASES
Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians, Plaintiffs,
v.
The State of California, Defendant.
Nos. C 97-04693, C 98-01806 CW.
United States District Court, N.D. California.
June 15, 2001.
Eduardo G. Roy, Arter & Hadden LLP, San Francisco, CA, Bradley G. Downes, Office of Tribal Atty., Hoopa, CA, Thomas P. Schlosser, Morisset, Schlosser, Ayer & Jozwiak, Seattle, WA, for Plaintiffs.
Kenneth R. Williams, Sara J. Drake, Atty. General's Office, Sacramento, CA, for Defendant.
Richard G. McCracken, J. Thomas Bowen, Elizabeth A. Lawrence, Davis, Cowell &…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Washington v. Confederated Tribes of the Colville Indian ReservationSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- California v. Cabazon Band of Mission IndiansSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- National Labor Relations Board v. American National InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Scott Douglas LACY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Artichoke Joe's v. NortonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2002
- Barona Band of Mission Indians v. YeeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Flynt v. California Gambling Control CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Pauma Band Mission Indians v. State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe of the Enterprise Rancheria v. CaliforniaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2016
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.