Legal Opinion
Flynt v. California Gambling Control Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 26, 2002No. A098186PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RUVOLO, J.
I
In March 2000, the overwhelming majority of California voters passed Proposition 1A, 1 which amended the California Constitution, giving the Governor the authority “to negotiate and conclude compacts, subject to ratification by the Legislature, for.the operation of slot machines and for the conduct of lottery games and banking games by federally recognized Indian tribes on Indian lands in California in accordance with federal law.” (Cal. Const., art. IV, § 19, subd. (f).)
Larry Flynt, a card room owner, and Hustler Casino and Normandie Casino, state-licensed card rooms…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Heller v. Doe Ex Rel. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Romer v. EvansSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Indian Gaming Related Cases. Chemehuevi Indian Tribe Elk Valley Rancheria Hoopa Valley Indian Tribe Hopland Band of Pomo Indians Redding Rancheria Smith River Rancheria, and Coyote Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. The State of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Rincon Band of Luiseno Mission Indians of the Rincon Reservation v. SchwarzeneggerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Big Valley Band of Pomo Indians v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
- Harris v. Investor's Business Daily, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2006
- McCRACKEN AND AMICK, INC. v. PerdueCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.