Legal Opinion
Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe of the Enterprise Rancheria v. California
District Court, E.D. California
Decided February 17, 2016No. 2:14-cv-01939-TLN-CKDPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
Troy L. Nunley, United States District Judge
The matter is before the Court on cross motions for judgment on the pleadings by Plaintiff the Estom Yumeka Maidu Tribe (hereinafter “Plaintiff’) and Defendant the State of California (hereinafter “Defendant”). (ECF Nos. 14, 17.) The Court has carefully considered the factual and legal issues presented in the parties’ filings, and the arguments raised in the amicus brief submitted by the California legislature (ECF No. 19). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs motion for judgment on the pleadings, and…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Seminole Tribe of Florida v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- New York v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Printz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Norfolk Southern Railway Co. v. Pittsburgh & West Virginia RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2017
- Stand Up for Cal. v. U.S. Dep't of the InteriorDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2018
- Alturas Indian Rancheria v. NewsomDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
- United Auburn Indian Community of the Auburn Rancheria v. NewsomCalifornia Supreme Court · 2020