Legal Opinion

Koeberl v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 12, 1934No. 29,734PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STONE, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying Ms alternative motion for amended findings or a new trial.

The action is upon a combined life and disability insurance policy; its purpose to recover as for permanent total disability, thus defined by the policy:

“Disability is total when it prevents the insured from engaging in any occupation or performing any work for compensation of financial value.”

There was a provision concerning “presumably permanent” disability and another stopping benefits whenever “such total disability has been terminated.”

December 8, 1930, the policy in force,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lobdill v. Laboring Men's Mutual Aid Ass'n of ChatfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1897
  2. Carson v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  3. Wilson v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1932
  4. Berset v. New York Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1928
  5. Mady v. Switchmen's Union of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weum v. Mutual Benefit Health & Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1952
  2. Blazek v. North American Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1957
  3. United States Stove Corp. Ex Rel. Henderson v. Ætna Life Ins.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Riteway Carriers, Inc. v. Stuyvesant Ins. CoCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API