National Bank of California v. Mulford
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles county, and from an order denying a new trial. W. R. Hervey, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Action to foreclose two mortgages. The facts, so far as necessary to the decision of the case, are as follows: For the purpose of securing the payment of his two promissory notes, the defendant W. L. Mulford executed to his codefendants Boggs and Noyes two mortgages, one upon chattels, the other upon certain real estate, after which he transferred all interest in the real estate mortgaged to defendant Los Angeles Paving Brick Company, appellant herein. Boggs and Noyes transferred the mortgages and notes to plaintiff, who, upon default in the payment thereof, instituted this action, joining W.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People v. McLeanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- People v. FitzpatrickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Klokke v. EscaillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
- Peachy v. WitterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Irvine v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Strange v. StrangeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1913