Strange v. Strange
California Court of Appeal
APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from orders made in the matter of a motion for a new trial. H. D. Burroughs, Judge presiding. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtRichards, J.
The appellant prosecutes herein three appeals—one from an order denying appellant’s motion for leave to amend her noticp of intention to move for a new trial; one from an order denying appellant’s motion for a new trial, and one from the judgment. They will be considered in the above order.
The order of the trial court refusing appellant leave to amend her notice of intention to move for a new trial was based on the objection that appellant’s notice of motion for leave to amend her notice of intention was served and filed thirty-three days after appellant had duly received written notice of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Union Collection Co. v. OliverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
- Estudillo v. SEC. Loan & Tr. Co. of S. Cal.California Supreme Court · 1910
- Little v. JacksCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Packer v. DorayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Salisbury v. BurrCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sitkei v. FrimelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
- Ungar Electric Tools, Inc. v. Sid Ungar Co., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1961
- Roberts v. LebrainCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Smith v. IbosCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
- Tannahill v. GreeningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.