Legal Opinion

Wilder v. Haughey

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 21, 1874PublishedCited by 32 opinions

Appeal by defendants, from a judgment of the district •court for Hennepin county, Vanderburgh, J., presiding, the ■action having been tried by the court without a jury.

1Opinion of the CourtBerry, J.

In November, 1862, the defendant John Haughey, having purchased of the state a quarter-section of *102school land, and paid fifteen per cent, of the purchase price, together with interest upon the residue to June 1, 1863, received from the commissioner of school lands the usual certificate of purchase, and immediately thereafter took possession of the land, which he has ever since held and occupied. The annual interest upon the residue of purchase money was duly paid by him for five successive years, and up to June 1, 1868, and he also paid the taxes levied upon the-premises for 1863 and 1864.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McKee v. WilcoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. Pelan v. De BevardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
  3. Deere v. ChapmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1861
  4. McCabe v. MazzuchelliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Platto v. CadyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1860

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Wheatley v. GriffinTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  2. Denzer v. PrendergastSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  3. Flanagan Estate v. Great Cent. Land Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  4. Ferguson v. KumlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  5. Helgebye v. DammenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1904

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API