Legal Opinion

Keith v. Albrecht

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 8, 1903No. Nos. 13,474—(78)PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal by plaintiff from an order of the district court for Lac qui Parle county, Powers, J., granting a motion for a new trial.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Action to set aside a transfer of a quarter section of land in the county of Lac qui Parle to the defendant as fraudulent as to the creditors of her husband, John Albrecht. The cause was tried by a referee, who, as a conclusion of law from his findings of fact, found that the conveyance was fraudulent as alleged; that the defendant held the land, and .the whole thereof, in trust in favor of the creditors of her husband; that it be sold, and the proceeds thereof applied to the payment of the claims of such creditors; and that judgment be so entered. The defendant then made a motion to set…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McArthur v. MartinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1876
  2. Wilder v. HaugheySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1874
  3. Ferguson v. KumlerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1880
  4. Kaser v. HaasSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
  5. Baldwin v. RogersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1881

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Stearns v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  2. Shea v. LewisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1913
  3. Summers v. Midland Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1926
  4. Thysell v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1916
  5. O'Brien v. HeggenCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1983

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API