Legal Opinion
United States v. Hunter
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 31, 1975No. Crim. 2008-68, 800-71, 904-72 and 981-73PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Chief Judge:
When these applications for excess compensation pursuant to the Criminal Justice Act, as amended, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(d), were first before me, I concluded that each attorney had rendered “extended or complex” representation and that each of the applications were sufficiently detailed to permit a finding that the services, provided to the indigent defendants in these felony cases were “reasonably expended” in the course of counsel’s representation of the indigent defendant. United States v. Hunter, 385 F.Supp. 358 (D.D.C.1974). In each of these cases, the trial judge…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Udall v. TallmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- United States v. NaplesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
- United States v. HanrahanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- United States v. HarperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1970
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States of America, and U.S. District Court Western District of New York v. Darnyl ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- United States v. Richard BrownCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. Terrance BaileyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- People v. AtkinsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- United States v. Johnson.District Court, District of Columbia · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.