Legal Opinion
United States v. Harper
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided March 31, 1970No. Crim. No. 68-68PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Chief Judge, District of Columbia Circuit:
When I first considered this application for a counsel fee in excess of $500, I concluded from the papers then before me that the services rendered did not constitute “protracted representation” within the meaning of the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(d). Accordingly, I returned the application without my approval. Thereafter, I received a thoughtful letter from counsel drawing my attention to a report prepared by Professor Dallin H. Oaks of the University of Chicago Law School.1 Relying on that report and drawing from his own…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- United States v. NaplesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1967
- United States v. OwensDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1966
- United States v. HanrahanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
- United States v. UrsiniDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1968
- United States v. MooreDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Melvin Leroy Tyler v. Warden Lark Norton Y. Beilenson v. Treasurer of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- United States v. Terrance BaileyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- United States v. CarnevaleDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985
- United States v. HunterDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1975
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.