Legal Opinion

United States v. Richard Brown

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 13, 2015No. 13-10354PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERZON, Circuit Judge:

United States v. Rivera-Corona, 618 F.3d 976 (9th Cir.2010), held that an indigent criminal defendant need not establish a conflict with his attorney amounting to the constructive denial of counsel as a prerequisite to substituting appointed counsel for his retained attorney. The district court in this case, like the parties, appears to have been unaware of Rivera-Corona, and instead applied the conflict requirement applicable to substitutions of appointed counsel for appointed counsel. We now reiterate Riverar-Corona’s intertwined rules: (1) A defendant enjoys a…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. United States v. James LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  2. United States v. James WellsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  3. United States v. Jesus BarraganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States v. Tuan LuongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
  5. United States v. Gabriel Jiminez-AntunezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API