United States v. Richard Brown
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERZON, Circuit Judge:
United States v. Rivera-Corona, 618 F.3d 976 (9th Cir.2010), held that an indigent criminal defendant need not establish a conflict with his attorney amounting to the constructive denial of counsel as a prerequisite to substituting appointed counsel for his retained attorney. The district court in this case, like the parties, appears to have been unaware of Rivera-Corona, and instead applied the conflict requirement applicable to substitutions of appointed counsel for appointed counsel. We now reiterate Riverar-Corona’s intertwined rules: (1) A defendant enjoys a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Gideon v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. Gonzalez-LopezSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- United States v. James LloydCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- United States v. James WellsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Jesus BarraganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States v. Tuan LuongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Gabriel Jiminez-AntunezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2016
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.