United States v. Hanrahan
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
BAZELON, Chief Judge.
The services in this case were rendered at a hearing after remand from this court to determine whether defendant’s right to speedy trial had been denied. See Hanrahan v. United States, 121 U.S. App.D.C. 134, 348 F.2d 363 (1965). Counsel appeared in court two days to secure continuances and twenty days for the hearing for a total of seventy hours. Fourteen hours were spent in preparation for the hearing and thirty-four hours were spent studying lengthy trial and hearing transcripts in order to prepare suggested findings of fact and conclusions of law ordered by the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Gene Z. Hanrahan v. United States of America, William T. P. Shea v. United States of America, John W. Tynan v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
- United States v. MooreDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1966
3Cited by12 opinions
- United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- United States v. JamesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1969
- United States v. CarnevaleDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1985
- Thompson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
- United States v. HarperDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1970
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.