Legal Opinion

United States v. Naples

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided March 28, 1967No. Crim. 91-59, 1005-65PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Before me are applications for excess compensation requiring my approval under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(d). Although I agree with the District Court that each of these attorneys rendered highly competent and valuable services, I am constrained to return these applications without my approval.

I

Two of the applications list 400 and 450 hours respectively as “out of court” time without specifying how the time was spent. Although I entertain no doubt that such time was expended on the case, I cannot properly discharge my responsibilities under the Act on the basis of this scant…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. People v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hulse v. WifvatSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
  2. United States v. MiroyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
  4. United States v. Terrance BaileyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
  5. United States v. JamesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1969

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API