United States v. Naples
District Court, District of Columbia
1Opinion of the Court
Before me are applications for excess compensation requiring my approval under the Criminal Justice Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3006A(d). Although I agree with the District Court that each of these attorneys rendered highly competent and valuable services, I am constrained to return these applications without my approval.
I
Two of the applications list 400 and 450 hours respectively as “out of court” time without specifying how the time was spent. Although I entertain no doubt that such time was expended on the case, I cannot properly discharge my responsibilities under the Act on the basis of this scant…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- People v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1967
3Cited by19 opinions
- Hulse v. WifvatSupreme Court of Iowa · 1981
- United States v. MiroyanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. ThompsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1973
- United States v. Terrance BaileyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1978
- United States v. JamesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 1969
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.