Legal Opinion
Casias v. Continental Casualty Co.
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided May 22, 1998No. 18216PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
PICKARD, Judge.
{1} Georgina and Joe Casias (Plaintiffs) filed a complaint against Continental Casualty Company (Insurer) based upon a combined homeowner and automobile insurance policy entered into between Insurer and Octaviano and Elvira Valdez (Valdez). Plaintiffs, who were injured in a car accident with Derek Valdez, the insured’s son, claim that they are intended third-party beneficiaries under the insurance policy and are entitled to medical-payment-coverage benefits. Plaintiffs also asserted a claim against Insurer for bad faith refusal to pay. On cross motions for summary…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Valdez v. Cillessen & Son, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
- Sanchez v. HerreraNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1989
- Fleet Mortgage Corp. v. SchusterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Jaramillo v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
- Gardner-Zemke Co. v. StateNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Ponder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Public Service Co. v. Diamond D Construction Co.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2001
- Tarin's, Inc. v. TinleyNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1999
- Thompson v. PotterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Doña Ana Mutual Domestic Water Consumers Ass'n v. City of Las CrucesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.