Legal Opinion
Jaramillo v. Providence Washington Insurance
New Mexico Supreme Court
Decided February 16, 1994No. 20191PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RANSOM, Chief Justice.
Each of the parties to this appeal having moved for rehearing on the filing of our opinion on January 19, 1994, which motions we deny, we withdraw that original opinion and substitute the following. We wish to state that it is not our intention to retreat from long-standing principles and rules of construction in the application and interpretation of insurance policies. Special rules quite rightly apply to such contracts in favor of persons who show that they are within the class of insureds that the provisions to be enforced were intended to benefit. We also wish…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Mark V, Inc. v. MellekasNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1993
- C.R. Anthony Co. v. Loretto Mall PartnersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
- Hofer v. LavenderTexas Supreme Court · 1984
- Chavez v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
- Rowen v. Le Mars Mut. Ins. Co. of IowaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1979
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Fairfield Insurance Co. v. Stephens Martin Paving, LPTexas Supreme Court · 2008
- Rummel v. Lexington InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1997
- Ponder v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2000
- Gallegos v. Pueblo of TesuqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. New Mexico State Highway & Transportation Department v. BacaNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.