Legal Opinion
Tarin's, Inc. v. Tinley
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided November 3, 1999No. 19,945PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BUSTAMANTE, Judge.
{1} Plaintiff Tarin’s, Inc. (Tarin), appeals the dismissal of its suit against Defendants. Tarin argues that its suit against Advanced Mechanical, Inc., doing business as Total Service Company (Advanced), should not have been dismissed because it was a third-party beneficiary of the contract between Advanced as subcontractor and the general contractor. Tarin also argues that Investment Company of the Southwest (ICSW), the closely-held corporation of Bob Tinley (Tinley), and Tinley individually, should not have been dismissed as defendants because ICSW and Tinley…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Schmitz v. SmentowskiNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1990
- Boyle v. SteimanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
- Vidimos, Inc. v. Laser Lab Ltd., and Wysong Laser Co., Inc., and Wysong & Miles Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- Thomson v. Espey Huston & Associates, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Valdez v. Cillessen & Son, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1987
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Warner v. Design & Build Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- McElhannon v. FordNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2003
- Vigil v. State Auditor's OfficeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Thompson v. PotterNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2011
- Doña Ana Mutual Domestic Water Consumers Ass'n v. City of Las CrucesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.