Legal Opinion

Valdez v. Cillessen & Son, Inc.

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided February 25, 1987No. 16617PublishedCited by 72 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WALTERS, Justice.

This case was certified to us on interlocutory appeal to determine the propriety of summary judgments granted in favor of defendant on certain of plaintiff’s claimed causes of action, and the denial of summary judgment on a remaining count. Both parties appeal. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

Facts

Defendant Cillessen and Son, Inc. contracted with the Indian Housing Authority to construct housing at Picuris Pueblo, Cillessen subcontracting the lathing and plastering work to All State Lathing and Plastering. All State hired plaintiff Archie Valdez as a lather and…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Kelley v. Howard S. Wright Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1978
  2. King v. Shelby Rural Electric Cooperative Corp.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1973
  3. Archibeque v. HomrichNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1975
  4. New Mexico Electric Service Co. v. MontanezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1976
  5. Tipton v. Texaco, Inc.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by72 opinions

  1. Hooker v. Department of TransportationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Camargo v. Tjaarda DairyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Fleet Mortgage Corp. v. SchusterNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Jaramillo v. Providence Washington InsuranceNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1994
  5. Mentzer v. OgnibeneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

67 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API