Luce v. United Technologies Corp.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PALMER, J.
In this certified appeal, we must decide whether the Appellate Court properly affirmed the decision of the compensation review board (board) excluding certain benefits from the calculation of the plaintiffs average weekly wage under General Statutes (Rev. to *1281991) § 31-3101 for purposes of establishing his workers’ compensation payments. We conclude that it did and thus affirm the judgment of the Appellate Court.
The relevant facts and procedural history are not disputed. The workers’ compensation commissioner for the first district (commissioner) found that the plaintiff,…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Federal Communications Commission v. Beach Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Nordlinger v. HahnSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States Railroad Retirement Board v. FritzSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public HealthSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. VegaSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Rayhall v. Akim Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
- Gartrell v. Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
- Connor v. Statewide Grievance CommitteeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2002
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.