Legal Opinion
Karp v. Urban Redevelopment Commission
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided March 22, 1972PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.
The plaintiff applied to the Superior Court for review of the defendant’s statement of compensation for the taking of property owned by her. In the application, she alleged that she is aggrieved by the assessment of damages contained in the statement. The plaintiff filed the application on August 14, 1967. The defendant filed a motion to erase on the ground that the plaintiff filed the appeal more than six months after the defendant had filed the statement of compensation with the court. The court granted the motion and the plaintiff has appealed.
A motion to erase a case from the docket will…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Carten v. CartenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1966
- Preferred Accident Insurance v. Musante, Berman & Steinberg Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
- Guerriero v. GalassoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1957
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Mingachos v. CBS, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
- Ajadi v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Zinn v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1983
- Tazza v. Planning & Zoning CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Diamond National Corp. v. DwelleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.