State Ex Rel. Bliss v. Grand River Drainage District
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the CourtRagland, J.
This case comes to the writer on reassignment. It is an original proceeding in mandamus; the relators, claiming to be the holders of certain bonds issued by the respondent Grand River Drainage District, seek to compel their payment out of a fund alleged to have been collected and set apart for that purpose.
The alternative writ, incorporating the petition therefor, after alleging that the respondent, Grand River Drainage District of Livingston and Linn Counties, Missouri, was duly incorporated as a drainage district under and by virtue of what is now Article I, Chau- ter 64, Revised Statutes…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State ex rel. Potter v. RileySupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
- State ex rel. Hixson v. NerryMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904
3Cited by13 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Sturdivant Bank v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- State Ex Rel. Drainage District No. 8 v. DuncanSupreme Court of Missouri · 1934
- Rohwer v. GibsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Kerr Glass Manufacturing Corp. v. City of San BuenaventuraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936
- State ex rel. Aubuchon v. JonesMissouri Court of Appeals · 1965
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.