Legal Opinion

Haga v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1938No. 27045. Department TwoPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlake, J.

Plaintiff, a civil service employee of the defendant city, brought this action to recover compensation accruing to his position during a period he claims to have been wrongfully separated from it. The case was tried to the court, which found that plaintiff had been wrongfully separated from his position for forty-three days. From judgment accordingly entered, both plaintiff and defendant appeal.

With one exception, the material facts are not in dispute. It appears that in 1924 plaintiff acquired civil service standing as a carpenter; that from time to time he was employed as such in the park…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Ausburn v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State Ex Rel. Allen v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Allard v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  4. State Ex Rel. Abel v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. State Ex Rel. Jarrett v. SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Washington Security Co. v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Watkins v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  3. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Haga v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API