Legal Opinion

Haga v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1940No. 27750PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

Plaintiffs brought this action to recover compensation accruing to their civil service positions during the intervals when they were separated from those positions.

There were six causes of action set out in the complaint. Haga appeared as plaintiff in the first and second causes of action, King in the third, Delmar in the fourth, Langum in the fifth, and Simmonds in the sixth cause of action. All plaintiffs were duly certified and classified civil service workers of the city of Seattle. Haga and Simmonds were carpenters, and the other plaintiffs were painters.

In the first cause of action,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State Compensation Insurance Fund v. RileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Matter of Danker v. Dept. of HealthNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  4. Storey v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  5. State ex rel. Burris v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1914

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mount Spokane Skiing Corp. v. Spokane CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1997
  2. Cunningham v. Community College District No. 3Washington Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Ex Rel. Morris v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Cluff v. State of ArizonaArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Scottsdale Insurance Company v. Corporate Recoveries IncorporatedDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API