Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. Jarrett v. Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1936No. 25931. En BancPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

K. W. Jarrett brought this action in mandamus in the superior court, seeking to be reinstated under civil service rules and regulations as truck driver in the streets and sewers department of the city of Seattle. Belief was granted by the trial court and judgment entered in accordance with the findings and conclusions. The city of Seattle and certain officers who were parties to the action have appealed. The case is here on the facts as found by the trial court, since no statement of facts or bill of exceptions has been brought to this court.

Subdivision 40 of § 18 of Art. IV of the city…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State ex rel. Wettrick v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Petley v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Allard v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. State Ex Rel. Mattice v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1933

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Watkins v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  2. State Ex Rel. Cooper v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Haga v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Hall v. ElliottWashington Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Miller v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API