Allard v. City of Tacoma
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.
— This action was brought by a former civil service employee of the city of Tacoma for the determination of his rights to a particular position and for the recovery of the compensation attached thereto.
In the complaint, there were two causes of action, separately stated. The trial was to the court without a jury, and resulted in findings of fact from which it was concluded that the plaintiff was entitled to prevail upon his first cause of action, but not upon the second. Judgment was entered in favor of the plaintiff in the sum of $945, from which judgment the defendant city alone appeals.
The…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Alabama City, G. & A. Ry. Co. v. City of GadsdenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1913
- State ex rel. Dudley v. DaggettWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- City of Globe v. RabogliattiArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Petley v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- City of Bowling Green v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1906
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Ausburn v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
- Watkins v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1940
- Lane v. Harborview Medical CenterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
- City of Phoenix v. PowersArizona Supreme Court · 1941
- Lane v. HARBORVIEW MEDICAL CENTERCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.