Legal Opinion

Watkins v. City of Seattle

Washington Supreme Court

Decided February 20, 1940No. 27356PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Plaintiff, in his own behalf and as assignee of the claims of six fellow employees, brought suit against the city of Seattle (1) for the recovery of wages that would have been earned by them as auto truck drivers during certain periods of time when they were laid off from work which, in the meanwhile, was performed by men classified as laborers, and (2) for the recovery of the difference between the amounts which they should have received as the wages of truck drivers and the amounts which were actually paid them as the wages of laborers. The cause was tried to the court and resulted in a…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Snohomish CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1918
  2. State Ex Rel. Knez v. SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  3. State Ex Rel. Pike v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  4. State Ex Rel. Ausburn v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Rhodes v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Scannell v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Vallet v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Porter v. NossenDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. State Ex Rel. Beck v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
  5. Malcolm v. Yakima County Consolidated School District No. 90Washington Supreme Court · 1945

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API