Legal Opinion
Robert Hameetman, Cross-Appellee v. The City of Chicago, Cross-Appellants
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided September 30, 1985No. 83-1986, 83-2070PublishedCited by 103 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POSNER, Circuit Judge.
In 1978 Robert Hameetman, a fireman employed by the City of Chicago, was charged by his superiors with violating a city ordinance which requires that “all officers and employees in the classified civil service of the City shall be actual residents of the City.” A hearing officer of the city’s Personnel Board conducted a hearing on whether Hameetman was as he claimed a resident of Chicago although his wife and children lived in Indiana. After summarizing the sharply conflicting evidence, the hearing officer’s report stated under “findings and recommendations”: “The City…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by103 opinions
- City of Chicago v. International College of SurgeonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Mark B. Harmon v. Richard L. Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
- Ruben Ramirez Sanchez v. H.G. Miller, Warden, United States Penitentiary, Marion, IllinoisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Rivera Santiago v. Secretario de HaciendaSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1987
- Qaid Rafeeq Azeez and Abdullah Muhammad v. James W. Fairman, Warden, John E. Wright, Asst. Warden, and A. Dodge, 120 (c.o.)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
98 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.