Legal Opinion
Mark B. Harmon v. Richard L. Thornburgh, Attorney General of the United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided September 1, 1989No. 88-5265PublishedCited by 203 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge WALD.
Opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part filed by Circuit Judge SILBERMAN.
WALD, Chief Judge:
Appellants Richard L. Thornburgh, et al., on behalf of the United States Department of Justice (“DOJ” or “Department”), appeal from a permanent injunction issued by the district court. That injunction, as subsequently modified by this court, forbade DOJ to implement a random urinalysis drug-testing program covering three categories of Department employees: prosecutors in criminal cases, employees with access to grand jury proceedings, and…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. GraceSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by203 opinions
- Hill v. National Collegiate Athletic Assn.California Supreme Court · 1994
- National Mining Association v. U.S. Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998
- East Bay Sanctuary Covenant v. Donald TrumpCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Clayton Yeutter, Secretary, United States Department of AgricultureCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
- Hennessey v. Coastal Eagle Point Oil Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1992
198 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.