Legal Opinion

State v. Keeton

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 30, 1997No. C5-97-52PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Appellant Laird Brando Keeton, Jr. contends the district court erred in excluding him from an in camera hearing held to determine whether appellant threatened a co-defendant into not testifying. Appellant further argues the district court erred by admitting statements of nontestifying co-defendants, claiming the statements are inadmissible hearsay and their admission violates his right to confrontation. Appellant also: (1) challenges the admission of Spreigl evidence; (2) contests the imposition of consecutive sentences for attempted murder and assault; and (3) asks…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Gerstein v. PughSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Idaho v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  3. Kentucky v. StincerSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. Fabio v. BellomoSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1993

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HallumSupreme Court of Iowa · 2000
  2. State v. KeetonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
  3. State v. AubidCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1998
  4. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API