State v. $217,590.00 in United States Currency
Texas Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice O’Neill
This case involves the forfeiture of $217,590 allegedly derived from illegal drug trafficking. See TexCiiim. PROc.Code art. 59.01-.08 (the “civil forfeiture statute”). We must decide whether the claimant, Henry Perez Olvera, voluntarily consented to the search that revealed the money and the evidence linking it to criminal activity. In doing so, we decide the standard appellate courts must apply in civil forfeiture proceedings to review a trial court’s disposition of a motion to suppress evidence allegedly obtained as the result of an illegal search.1 We hold that whether a claimant…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Mapp v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Guzman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
- Bumper v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Meekins v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2011
- City of Dallas v. StewartTexas Supreme Court · 2012
- Hardy v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 2003
- United States v. FortCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Texas, the State Of v. Thirty Thousand Six Hundred Dollars and No/100 ($30,660.00) in U.S. Currency, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2004
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.