Legal Opinion

City of Dallas v. Stewart

Texas Supreme Court

Decided January 27, 2012No. 09-0257PublishedCited by 121 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Jefferson

joined by Justice HECHT, Justice MEDINA, Justice WILLETT, and Justice LEHRMANN.

We deny the motion for rehearing. We withdraw our opinion of July 1, 2011 and substitute the following in its place.

Urban blight threatens neighborhoods. Either as a risk to public health or as a base for illicit activity, dilapidated structures harm property values far more than their numbers suggest. Cities must be able to abate1 these nuisances to avoid disease and deter crime. But when the government sets up a mechanism to deal with this very real problem, it must nonetheless comply with constitutional mandates…

2Cases cited54 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Northern Pipeline Construction Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
  5. In the interest of C.H.Texas Supreme Court · 2002

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by121 opinions

  1. Texas West Oaks Hospital, LP v. WilliamsTexas Supreme Court · 2012
  2. Finance Commission v. NorwoodTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Clint Independent School District v. Sonia Herrera Marquez, Claudia Garcia, and Alicia Gomez, for and on the Behalf of Their Minor ChildrenTexas Supreme Court · 2016
  4. City of Lorena, Texas v. Bmtp Holdings, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2013
  5. Texas Health Presbyterian Hospital of Denton, Marc Wilson, M.D., and Alliance ob/gyn Specialists, Pllc D/B/A ob/gyn Specialists, Pllc v. D.A. and M.A., Individually and as Next Friends of A.A., a MinorTexas Supreme Court · 2018

116 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API