Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDowell

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 19, 2014No. 50ag/12PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWatts, J.

This attorney discipline proceeding involves a lawyer who “robo-signed” a large number of foreclosure-related documents, 1 and the managing partner of the law firm at which the robo-signing occurred.

While John Stephen Burson (“Burson”), Respondent, a member of the Bar of Maryland, was the managing partner of the law firm that is now Shapiro Brown & Alt, LLP (“the Shapiro Firm”), 2 Matthew John McDowell (“McDowell”), Respondent, a member of the Bar of Maryland and a lawyer at the Shapiro Firm, signed trustee’s deeds 3 and affidavits on behalf of William M. Savage (“Savage”), another lawyer and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. DoreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2013
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. PaulCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2011
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GoldbergCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1982
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. FrostCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SperlingCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BasingerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. McLaughlinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. WooleryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2017
  5. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2015

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API