Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Goldberg

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 23, 1982No. [Misc. (BV) No. 11, September Term, 1981.]PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSmith, J.

Davidson, J., would have reprimanded.

Bar Counsel, acting pursuant to the provisions of Maryland Rule BV9, filed a petition with us on behalf of the Attorney Grievance Commission seeking disciplinary action against Ronald S. Goldberg, a member of the Maryland bar. The petition alleged sixteen instances of professional misconduct which essentially involved neglect. Pursuant to Rule BV9 b, we referred the matter for hearing to a judge of the Circuit Court for Montgomery County. He made the following findings of fact after hearings that consumed three days:

"There is little, if any, dispute by the…

2Cited by29 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. GlennCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1996
  2. Attorney Grievance Commission v. MooneyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  3. Matter of GoldbergDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Potomac Electric Power Co. v. Electric Motor Supply, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1999
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEV. COMM'N OF MARYLAND v. PowellCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1992

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API