Legal Opinion

Attorney Grievance Commission v. Woolery

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided December 15, 2017No. 15ag/16PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.

No one who has practiced law for any appreciable time can claim to have never made a mistake in that practice. A mistake in the practice of law is not necessarily professional misconduct. However, once aware of a mistake that harms another and given the opportunity to mitigate it, a lawyer who decides to do nothing may be guilty of misconduct.

Respondent Benjamin Woolery was appointed as personal representative for an estate that had a single asset—real property that had served as the decedent’s home. There were five heirs—adult children of the decedent—with different ideas as to how to…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Commission v. BleeckerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  2. Beyer v. Morgan State UniversityCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  3. Attorney Grievance Commission v. SteinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  4. Attorney Grievance Commission v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
  5. ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COM'N OF MARYLAND v. QueenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. WooleryCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018
  2. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. SinghCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  3. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. MaldonadoCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2019
  4. Attorney Grievance v. YiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2020
  5. Attorney Grievance Comm'n of Md. v. NdiCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2018

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API