Commonwealth v. Whitmore
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Justice NEWMAN.
We granted allowance of appeal to decide “whether the Superior Court exceeded its authority by sua sponte removing the sentencing judge.” Commonwealth v. Whitmore, 584 Pa. 436, 884 A.2d 247 (2005). For the reasons herein, we hold that it did, and therefore, reverse the Superior Court.
*378 FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On January 11, 1999, in the entrance of an alleyway behind the 3100 block of Custer Street in Philadelphia, Raheem Whitmore (Appellee) sold Patricia Lee (Lee) six clear plastic, black-lidded vials containing crack cocaine in exchange for an undetermined amount of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. MouzonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. TravagliaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
- Commonwealth v. PierceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Reilly v. Southeastern Pennsylvania Transportation AuthoritySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by59 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BennettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. VenturaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. MacIasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Commonwealth v. CorleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2011
- Commonwealth v. SarveySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.