Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Mouzon

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 19, 2002No. 43 EAP 2001PublishedCited by 543 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

Justice NIGRO.

The issue presented in the instant appeal is whether the Superior Court erred in refusing to review Appellant Jerome Mouzon’s challenge to the discretionary aspects of his criminal sentence based upon its conclusion that his claim of excessiveness failed to raise a substantial question as a matter of law because his sentence was within the statutory limits. As we find the Superior Court erred, we reverse.

Traditionally, the trial court is afforded broad discretion in sentencing criminal defendants “because of the perception that the…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Commonwealth v. GogginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth v. RoddaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  5. P.J.S. v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by543 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AntidormiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. WallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  3. Commonwealth v. DodgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  4. Commonwealth v. MalovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  5. Commonwealth v. TiradoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

538 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API