Commonwealth v. Mouzon
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ANNOUNCING THE JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
Justice NIGRO.
The issue presented in the instant appeal is whether the Superior Court erred in refusing to review Appellant Jerome Mouzon’s challenge to the discretionary aspects of his criminal sentence based upon its conclusion that his claim of excessiveness failed to raise a substantial question as a matter of law because his sentence was within the statutory limits. As we find the Superior Court erred, we reverse.
Traditionally, the trial court is afforded broad discretion in sentencing criminal defendants “because of the perception that the…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- Shalala v. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Commonwealth v. TuladzieckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Commonwealth v. GogginsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
- Commonwealth v. RoddaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
- P.J.S. v. Pennsylvania State Ethics CommissionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by543 opinions
- Commonwealth v. AntidormiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. WallsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. DodgeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Commonwealth v. MalovichSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- Commonwealth v. TiradoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
538 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.