Commonwealth v. Pierce
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NEWMAN, Justice.
Michael Pierce (Appellant) appeals, pro se, from the denial of his first petition for post-conviction relief, pursuant to the Post Conviction Relief Act (PCRA).1 We affirm.
I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
We described the facts of Appellant’s convictions for three counts of first-degree murder and related charges in our opinion on direct review as follows:
The evidence presented in the instant case established that at approximately 3:00 a.m. on the morning of July 10, 1989, Joan Pierce, the appellant’s sister, was awakened by the strong smell of gasoline. Joan woke her…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Commonwealth v. TurnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. FinleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Commonwealth v. AlbrechtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. KimballSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by375 opinions
- Commonwealth v. GrantSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
- Commonwealth v. AliSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Commonwealth v. BomarSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. McGillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
370 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.