Legal Opinion
Grover v. Woodward
New Jersey Court of Chancery
Decided February 5, 1920PublishedCited by 6 opinions
On order to eliow cause wliy restraining order should not be granted.
1Opinion of the Court
Buchanan, V. C.
The bill in this cause is filed to enjoin the prosecution of .a suit brought in Pennsylvania by defendant against complainants. The present application is for interim restraint.
The circumstances as disclosed by the bill and affidavits on both .sides are as follows:
Both complainants and defendant are, and have been for many years, residents and citizens of New Jersey.
Defendant carries on his business at Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. August 15th, 1919, complainants sold and defendant purchased two carloads of Giant potatoes, Grade No. 1, for $1,-313 and $1,262.50, respectiveljr,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bigelow v. Old Dominion Copper Mining & Smelting Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1908
- Federal Trust Co. v. ConklinNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1916
- Margarum v. MoonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Richey & Gilbert Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1925
- Second National Bank of Phila. v. ThompsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Prozel & Steigman, Inc. v. International Fruit DistributorsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1959
- Lundy v. CollittiNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.