Legal Opinion

Federal Trust Co. v. Conklin

New Jersey Court of Chancery

Decided August 5, 1916PublishedCited by 16 opinions

On bill, &c.

1Opinion of the Court

Foster, V. C. ■

The bill in this cause is filed to establish and enforce an equitable set-off, and, incidentally, to restrain defendant from prosecuting an action on an attachment in the supreme court of the State of New York.

The controversy arises out of the following circumstances:

Complainant is a trust company of this state, having its principal place of business in Newark; defendant is a resident of Paterson, in this state, and he also has, and for some years past has, maintained a residence in the city of New York. Defendant is the’ assignee of one Cesare Conti, a resident of the city of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fera v. . WickhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  2. Frank v. . Mercantile National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
  3. Crosby v. Bank of NiagaraNew York Supreme Court · 1915
  4. In re BluestoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
  5. Paoli v. East River National BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. FelterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
  2. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
  3. Second National Bank of Phila. v. ThompsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
  4. Bovard v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Grover v. WoodwardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API