Federal Trust Co. v. Conklin
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On bill, &c.
1Opinion of the Court
Foster, V. C. ■
The bill in this cause is filed to establish and enforce an equitable set-off, and, incidentally, to restrain defendant from prosecuting an action on an attachment in the supreme court of the State of New York.
The controversy arises out of the following circumstances:
Complainant is a trust company of this state, having its principal place of business in Newark; defendant is a resident of Paterson, in this state, and he also has, and for some years past has, maintained a residence in the city of New York. Defendant is the’ assignee of one Cesare Conti, a resident of the city of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Fera v. . WickhamNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
- Frank v. . Mercantile National BankNew York Court of Appeals · 1905
- Crosby v. Bank of NiagaraNew York Supreme Court · 1915
- In re BluestoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Paoli v. East River National BankAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1915
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. FelterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Co. v. PopeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1952
- Second National Bank of Phila. v. ThompsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Bovard v. StateMississippi Supreme Court · 1872
- Grover v. WoodwardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.