Margarum v. Moon
New Jersey Court of Chancery
On order to show cause why an injunction should not issue-restraining the defendant from prosecuting an attachment in the courts of West Virginia.
1Opinion of the Court
Reed, V. C.
Margarían, the complainant, resides in Trenton, is married,, living with and supporting a family, and not owning $200 worth of personal property. He is a -servant of the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, which company owes him for wages the sum of $100.
Walter E. Moon, the defendant, is also a resident of this state. Margarían owes Moon the sum of $66.61. According to the affidavits Moon has assigned his claim against Margarían to-*588George 0. Smith, attorney for the Delaware Mercantile Company, of Harrisburg. The assignee has attached, in the courts of West Virginia, the wages due to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Cole v. CunninghamSupreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Wallace v. McConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
- Keyser v. RiceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1877
- Cunningham v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
3Cited by9 opinions
- Sensient Colors Inc. v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2008
- Royal Fraternal Union v. LundayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
- Prudential Ins. v. Merritt-Chapman ScottNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1933
- Second National Bank of Phila. v. ThompsonNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1947
- Caruso v. CarusoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1928
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.