Legal Opinion

Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. Richey & Gilbert Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1925No. 18683. Department TwoPublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

While this is a somewhat extraordinary case, both in common and legal parlance, it involves a primary question not entirely novel here.

In Rader v. Stubblefield, 43 Wash. 334, 86 Pac. 560, 10 Ann. Cas. 20, this court held, in accordance with the almost universal rule, that a citizen of this state, domiciled here, can be enjoined from prosecuting an action in another state against a citizen of this state, upon a proper showing of the facts, and any such injunction is not an attempt to control the action of a foreign court; that the writ of injunction is issued in a proceeding in personam…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Reed's Administratrix v. Illinois Central RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
  2. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co. v. McGinleyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Rader v. StubblefieldWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Gage v. Riverside Trust Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern California · 1898
  5. Freick v. HinklySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Edwards v. Surety Finance Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Clyde Philp v. Sam MacRi Pauline MacRi Joseph MacRi Eleanor MacRi Don R. MacRi Kathleen N. MacRi Herman Howe and Viola B. HoweCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1958
  3. State v. GilroyWashington Supreme Court · 1950
  4. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. ShellyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1930
  5. Oates v. Morningside CollegeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1934

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API