Legal Opinion
Shelden v. Marin County Employees' Retirement Ass'n
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 24, 2010No. A124912PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
JONES, P. J.
Appellant Richard Shelden filed a petition for writ of mandate (Code Civ. Proc., § 1085) and administrative mandamus (Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5) alleging respondents Marin County Employees’ Retirement Association (MCERA) and its governing Board of Retirement (Board) calculated his retirement benefits incorrectly. The trial court disagreed and denied the petition. Shelden now appeals arguing the trial court erred when interpreting the controlling statutes. We disagree and will affirm.
I. Factual and Procedural Background
Appellant Richard Shelden worked as a deputy sheriff for…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Keeler v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1956
- Dickey v. Retirement BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Kreeft v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1998
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Bernard v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- City of Scotts Valley v. County of Santa CruzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Alameda Cnty. Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Alameda Cnty. Employees' Ret. Assn., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Ideal Boat & Camper Storage v. County of AlamedaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
- Aurora S.A. v. PoiznerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.