Legal Opinion

Kreeft v. City of Oakland

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 30, 1998No. A079920PublishedCited by 37 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PARRILLI, J.

Plaintiffs are certified class representatives of firefighters who have retired under the Oakland Police and Fire Retirement System (retirees). Under the Oakland Police and Fire Retirement System (Fire Retirement System), a retiree’s pension is a fixed percentage of the current compensation “attach[ed] to the . . . rank” the retiree held upon retirement. Thus, as the salaries of active firefighters increase, so do the pensions Oakland (City) pays to its retired firefighters. This is a so-called “fluctuating” pension system.1

The federal Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Allen v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Ventura County Deputy Sheriffs' Ass'n v. Board of RetirementCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Domar Electric, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by37 opinions

  1. Kavanaugh v. West Sonoma County Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
  2. City of Oakland v. Oakland Police & Fire Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. KLAJIC v. Castaic Lake Water AgencyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
  4. Indep. Living Ctr. of S. Cal. v. Jennifer KentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
  5. City of Oakland v. Police, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API