Legal Opinion

Alameda Cnty. Deputy Sheriff's Ass'n v. Alameda Cnty. Employees' Ret. Assn.

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided January 8, 2018No. A141913PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtReardon, J.

*75This consolidated action arises out of the tension between two undeniably valid, and yet fundamentally opposed, public interests: the interest of the government in maintaining the flexibility to alter statutes to conform to current needs and the interest of public employees in a stable and predictable pension, earned through years of public service. On September 12, 2012, Governor Brown-faced with a statewide crisis involving the significant underfunding of public pension systems-signed into law the Public Employee Pension Reform Act of 2013 and related legislation (interchangeably, PEPRA,…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Yamaha Corp. of America v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Ghirardo v. AntonioliCalifornia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Driscoll v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Kern v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. City of Oakland v. Police, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  2. In re Franchise Tax Bd. Ltd. Liab. Corp. Tax Refund Cases, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  3. Hipsher v. L. A. Cnty. Emps. Ret. Ass'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  4. Wilmot v. Contra Costa Cnty. Employees' Ret. Ass'n, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
  5. (HC) Breiner v. PollardDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2023

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API