Legal Opinion
Keeler v. Superior Court
California Supreme Court
Decided June 1, 1956No. Sac. 6660PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.
This is a proceeding in mandamus to compel the respondent superior court to hear and determine a petition pending in that court for a writ of mandamus to order the respondent State Personnel Board to take no further action in the matter of the suspension of the petitioner Francis W. Keeler, a state employee in the respondent Department of Fish and Game.
The petitioner was suspended by the Director of the Department of Fish and Game for a period of 10 days without pay because of Ms refusal to take part in a creel census, a temporary assignment. He claimed that the counting of fish was outside…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Boren v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
- Brydonjack v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Tide Water Associated Oil Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Corum v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.California Court of Appeal · 1945
- Garcia v. California Employment Stabilization CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
3Cited by47 opinions
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Oto, L. L.C. v. KhoCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
- Anton v. San Antonio Community HospitalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Rich v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- Neary v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.