Legal Opinion

Labrenz v. Burnett

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided October 16, 2009No. S-12770PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FABE, Chief Justice.

J. INTRODUCTION

This appeal addresses a dispute between Jeffrey Labrenz and Shane and Jill Burnett over the use of land described in an easement. Labrenz has a driveway easement over the Burnetts' land, and in building his driveway, Labrenz installed decorative rocks, shrubs, trees, a fence, and a gate on the Burnetts' property. The superior court agreed with Labrenz that the slope of the Burnetts' land necessitated certain efforts to control erosion, but it found that many of Labrenz's improvements to the driveway easement were cosmetic in nature and ordered that…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. E. A. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Martens v. MetzgarAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  3. Andersen v. EdwardsAlaska Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Wasserman v. BartholomewAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Dressel v. WeeksAlaska Supreme Court · 1989

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ronny M. v. Nanette H.Alaska Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Offshore Systems-Kenai v. State, Department of Transportation & Public FacilitiesAlaska Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Jerry B. v. Sally B.Alaska Supreme Court · 2016
  4. Societe Financial, LLC d/b/a Alaska ATM, and James Dainis, individually v. MJ Corporation d/b/a Shell and 15th GrillAlaska Supreme Court · 2024
  5. Williams v. BakerAlaska Supreme Court · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API