Legal Opinion

Dressel v. Weeks

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided August 18, 1989No. S-2580PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORE, Justice.

In this case, we address the quantum of proof required to establish a claim for the conversion of an indeterminate amount of cash and the application of the doctrine of quasi estoppel to a real property dispute. The trial court held that Craft had borne her burden of proving damages on the conversion claim, and that quasi estoppel could be applied to preclude Dressel from asserting his legal title to the real property. We affirm.

I. FACTS

Dorothy Kuhns (Kuhns) met Dale Dres-sel (Dressel) in 1979. Soon thereafter they began to live together in Kuhns’ Fairbanks home. Kuhns was…

2Cases cited59 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. City of Long Beach v. MansellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  3. United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  4. Boggs v. Merced Mining Co.California Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Goodman v. WinterSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879

54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Sea Lion Corp. v. Air Logistics of Alaska, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Wright v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Soter's, Inc. v. Deseret Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nUtah Supreme Court · 1993
  4. K & K RECYCLING, INC. v. Alaska Gold Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Maynard v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1995

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API